skip to content rich footer

subscibe to the rss feed

Archive for May, 2012

Mixing Politics & Business is (mostly) Dumb

Saturday, May 5th, 2012

In a local supermarket carpark I spotted an aggressive right wing “JuLIAR” anti-carbon tax sticker in the top right corner of somebody’s rear window. Five feet later I turned back towards the car and noticed it belonged to a company. Branding on the side door and politics in the back window. Oh my God, No. Unless of course you’re a mining company… I guess then it could make sense.

A Company is Legally a Person, but…

Before anybody sends me a factional ball-busting via my email address let me put you straight on one point. Business… is not… about… your politics.

Maybe you didn’t hear me so I’ll go to some length to explain that a company is a legal person in its own right. It’s a person without a vote. But it’s a person who can exchange goods and services for money; it can be stolen from and it can steal from others; it pays tax. A company can be ethical or unethical depending on the type of business and the people who engage it. But a company is still only a business. It’s not a real person; a company is a legally recognised pseudo-person created for business transactions.

This should give you a clue as to why personal politics doesn’t belong on that company car. The business isn’t the owner. Not legally. Not actually. And definitely not in the voting context. Even if their business isn’t a company, if they are a sole trader or a partnership, it still doesn’t make sense. It’s kind of (mostly) dumb.

The Marketing Message is Off Message

Now step back a moment and think about the business marketing message a few million Australian Labor Party voters take away from the political statement on that company car. Aside from the fact the business owner could be an aggressive political stooge with an agenda other than serving customer needs.

It translates as… “Labor voters are stupid”… “Labor voters are not welcome”… “We reserve the right to treat anybody who doesn’t agree with our political opinion as a lesser customer.” The message is OFF MESSAGE. The message is “Our brand is political. Our brand takes sides.” If our brand happens to sell pens, matresses, accounting services or dildos I can just about tell you for a fact that a brand shouldn’t take sides. Not in an election. Not on a hot topic like human induced global warming and carbon pricing. Not when it’s easier to serve both opinions in that debate equally for maximised profit.

Taking sides is just plain redneck dumb, unless they sell mining equipment or something justifiable to the long-term marketing strategy.

A brand shouldn’t be about giving potential customer’s a quick punch in the face in the carpark. Unless, as mentioned, they sell mining equipment to Gina Rinehart.

Read the rest of this entry »

Social Networking

Keep an eye out for me on Instagram

About the Author

Steven Clark Steven Clark - the stand up guy on this site

My name is Steven Clark and I live in the Derwent Valley in Southern Tasmania. I have an MBA (Specialisation) and a Bachelor of Computing from the University of Tasmania. I'm a mazer & a yeast farmer (making beer, fruit wine and mead as by-products of continuous improvement in my farming practices). I'm a photographer, although my film cameras are currently silent. I do not tolerate idiots. I do not tolerate bigotry. I do not tolerate excuses. Let's be clear, if you sit with my enemies you my are my enemy for life.

Blogger. Thinker. Brewer. Drinker. Life partner to the amazing and incredible Megan.

skip to top of page